Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed11 January 20223279371

217 High Street, Yiewsley, West Drayton, UB7 7GN

the erection of 5 and 6 storey buildings to provide a health facility (approximately 10,000sqft) (Use Class E) and 233 residential apartments with associated parking, communal podium garden, landscaping, pedestrian and cycle canal link and external works following the demolition of the existing buildin gs

Authority
London Borough of Hillingdon
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Davies G

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the health centre could be provided on a sequentially preferable site in relation to flood risk

What decided it

The proposal failed the sequential test for flood risk because reasonably available, sequentially preferable sites existed for the health centre element of the scheme.

The significant benefits of the new health centre and affordable housing, together with moderate benefits from market housing and design improvements, did not outweigh the failure to meet the sequential test and the resulting harm from placing new development at risk of flooding.

Framework references: 162

Plan policies cited: Policy SI 12, Policy EM6, Policy DMEI 9, Policy GG3, Policy CI 1, Policy DMCI 2, Policy H4

Judgments cited: R (on the application of Khodari) v RLB Kensington & Chelsea and Cedarpark Holdings Ltd [2017] EWCA Civ 333

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.