Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed28 September 20213279666

1 Rodney Gardens, Eastcote, HA5 2RS

Renovation of existing dwelling, alterations to existing fenestration, rear extension, mezzanine floor and associated garden/landscaping works

Authority
London Borough of Hillingdon
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Scott A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether or not the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Eastcote Park Estate Conservation Area

What decided it

The proposal would cause less than substantial harm to the character and appearance of the Eastcote Park Estate Conservation Area, and the public benefits did not provide clear and convincing justification to outweigh this harm.

The less than substantial harm to the character and appearance of the conservation area was weighed against the public benefit of bringing a neglected dwelling back into use, but the harm was not outweighed by the benefits.

Framework references: 202

Plan policies cited: Policy BE1, Policy HE1, Policy DMHB 1, Policy DMHB 4, Policy DMHB 11, Policy DMHD 1, Policy HC1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.