Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 December 20213279786

38, Fanshawe Crescent, Dagenham, RM9 5ES

Roof alteration from hip to gable end for the proposed side extension

Authority
London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Langford-Tejrar K

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host dwelling, host terrace and surrounding area

What decided it

The proposed gable end roof would appear incongruous with the characteristic shallow hipped roofs of the Becontree Estate and would cause harm to the significance of the non-designated heritage asset that is not outweighed by any benefits.

The harm to the significance of the non-designated heritage asset was not outweighed by any benefits arising from the proposed development.

Plan policies cited: Policy D4 of the London Plan (LP 2021), Policy CP2 of the Local Development Framework Core Strategy (CS), Policy CP3 of the Local Development Framework Core Strategy (CS), Policy BP2 of the Local Development Framework Borough Wide Development Plan Policies DPD (BWDP), Policy BP8 of the Local Development Framework Borough Wide Development Plan Policies DPD (BWDP), Policy BP11 of the Local Development Framework Borough Wide Development Plan Policies DPD (BWDP)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.