Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 December 20213279878

Caldecote Mill, Caldecote Lane, NEWPORT PAGNELL, MK16 0HA

Authority
Milton Keynes Council
Appeal type
ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Wharton T

What decided it

Although the Council exhibited some procedural unreasonableness, the Inspector found this did not cause unnecessary loss and expense in the appeal process, as the appellant was always required to submit sufficient evidence at application stage and an appeal was inevitable.

Judgments cited: Uttlesford DC v SSE & White [1992] JPL 171; North Wiltshire District Council v Secretary of State for the Environment (1993) 65 P & CR 137; R Midcounties Cooperative Limited v Forest of Dean District Council [2017] EWHC 2050; Cumberlege v Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government [2017] EWHC 2057

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.