Planning appeal decision
Caldecote Mill, Caldecote Lane, NEWPORT PAGNELL, MK16 0HA
- Authority
- Milton Keynes Council
- Appeal type
- ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Wharton T
What decided it
Although the Council exhibited some procedural unreasonableness, the Inspector found this did not cause unnecessary loss and expense in the appeal process, as the appellant was always required to submit sufficient evidence at application stage and an appeal was inevitable.
Judgments cited: Uttlesford DC v SSE & White [1992] JPL 171; North Wiltshire District Council v Secretary of State for the Environment (1993) 65 P & CR 137; R Midcounties Cooperative Limited v Forest of Dean District Council [2017] EWHC 2050; Cumberlege v Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government [2017] EWHC 2057
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®