Planning appeal decision
Rushgreen, The Ridge, Linton, Wetherby, LS22 4HJ
front, rear & first floor extensions
- Authority
- Leeds City Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Caines A
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
What decided it
The bulk, massing and poor design quality of the extension would cause unacceptable harm to the distinctive character and appearance of the surrounding area, conflicting with development plan policies and the Framework.
Framework references: 12
Plan policies cited: Policy P10 of the Leeds City Council Core Strategy (as amended by the Core Strategy Selective Review 2019), saved Policy GP5 of the Leeds City Council Unitary Development Plan (Review 2006), saved Policy BD6 of the Leeds City Council Unitary Development Plan (Review 2006), policy HDG1 of the Council's adopted Supplementary Planning Document 'Householder Design Guide 2012', Policy A1 of the Linton Neighbourhood Plan
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®