Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed29 September 20213279918

Rushgreen, The Ridge, Linton, Wetherby, LS22 4HJ

front, rear & first floor extensions

Authority
Leeds City Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Caines A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area

What decided it

The bulk, massing and poor design quality of the extension would cause unacceptable harm to the distinctive character and appearance of the surrounding area, conflicting with development plan policies and the Framework.

Framework references: 12

Plan policies cited: Policy P10 of the Leeds City Council Core Strategy (as amended by the Core Strategy Selective Review 2019), saved Policy GP5 of the Leeds City Council Unitary Development Plan (Review 2006), saved Policy BD6 of the Leeds City Council Unitary Development Plan (Review 2006), policy HDG1 of the Council's adopted Supplementary Planning Document 'Householder Design Guide 2012', Policy A1 of the Linton Neighbourhood Plan

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.