Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed23 June 20223280015

Hayes Park North, Hayes Park, Hayes End Road, Hayes, UB4 8EE

Change of use of offices on all three floors into a total of 64 residential units comprising 6 x studios, 33 x one-bedroom, 19 x two- bedroom and 6 x three-bedroom units

Authority
London Borough of Hillingdon
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Dowsett J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The main issue in this appeal is whether the proposal is permitted development having regard to the provisions of Schedule 2, Part 3, Class O of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended), and in particular whether the building is within the curtilage of a listed building.

What decided it

The Inspector concluded that the appeal building was not within the curtilage of the Grade II* listed building, meaning the proposal fell within the scope of permitted development under Class O.

Framework references: 57

Judgments cited: Methuen-Campbell v Walters [1979] 1 QB 525; R (oao) Hampshire CC v Blackbushe Airport Ltd [2021] EWCA Civ 398; Challenge Fencing v Secretary of State for Housing Communities and Local Government [2019] EWHC 533 (Admin); Sumption v Greenwich LBC [2007] EWHC 2776 (Admin)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.