Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 December 20213280049

59-61 Camden High Street, London , NW1 7JL

Planning appeal 3280049 at 59-61 Camden High Street, London , NW1 7JL (London Borough of Camden) was dismissed on 6 December 2021 by Inspector Caines A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Camden Town Conservation Area.

erections to rear roof level and conversion of property to provide 8x dwellings

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Caines A
Postcode
NW1 7JL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Camden Town Conservation Area
  • Whether the development should make provision for affordable housing
  • Whether the development complies with local policies relating to air quality
  • Whether the development complies with local policies relating to 'car free' housing
  • Whether the development complies with local policies relating to the management of construction effects

What decided it

The significant adverse visual effect on the conservation area character and appearance, combined with the failure to secure required planning obligations for affordable housing, air quality mitigation, car-free development, and construction management, meant the proposal conflicted with the development plan with no material considerations to outweigh this conflict.

The benefits of delivering four additional dwellings in an accessible location and contributing to housing supply were outweighed by the significant harm to the character and appearance of the conservation area and the multiple conflicts with development plan policies on affordable housing, air quality, car-free housing, and construction effects.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D1Policy D2Policy H4Policy H2Policy CC4Policy T2Policy A1Policy DM1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 202Paragraph 64

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

749 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Camden

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed29 September 20266008940
    Basement Flat, 226 Finchley Road, London, NW3 6DH
  2. Dismissed8 September 20266009503
    Leapman House, 59 Primrose Gardens, London, NW3 4UL
  3. Allowed15 July 20266005997
    12 Sarre Road, London, NW2 3SL
  4. Notice upheld22 June 20263370592
    Third Floor Flat, 18 Stukeley Street, London, London, WC2B 5LR
  5. Notice upheld22 June 20263370591
    Land at: Fourth-Fifth Floor Duplexes, 18 Stukeley Street, London, WC2B 5LR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.