Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed4 August 20223280255

Land at Junction of Sawpit Road and School Road, Hurst, Reading, RG10 0DR

Planning appeal 3280255 at Land at Junction of Sawpit Road and School Road, Hurst, Reading, RG10 0DR (Wokingham Borough Council) was allowed on 4 August 2022 by Inspector Normington S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal is in a suitable location for housing having regard to national planning policies, the Council's spatial strategy for new housing and housing land supply.

the erection of 2 detached four-bedroom dwellings and 2 semi-detached three-bedroom dwellings, together with associated site access, car parking, home offices and landscape

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Normington S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal is in a suitable location for housing having regard to national planning policies, the Council's spatial strategy for new housing and housing land supply
  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether the proposal is in a suitable location for housing having regard to the accessibility of services, facilities and to the reliance on motor vehicles
  • The effect of the proposed development on trees
  • The effect of the proposed development on biodiversity
  • Whether the proposed development makes sufficient provision for affordable housing
  • Whether there are any material considerations which mean that the decision should be made otherwise than in accordance with the development plan (Planning Balance)

What decided it

The Council's inability to demonstrate a 5-year housing land supply, which triggered the tilted balance and meant that the benefits of housing delivery significantly outweighed the moderate harms to character, appearance and spatial strategy.

The benefits of delivering 4 new homes and a significant affordable housing contribution (£175,342.48) significantly outweigh the moderate harm to landscape character, visual impact and conflict with spatial strategy policies, in circumstances where the Council cannot demonstrate a 5-year housing land supply and the most important policies for determining the appeal are out-of-date

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
CS Policy CP1CS Policy CP3CS Policy CP5CS Policy CP6CS Policy CP7CS Policy CP9CS Policy CP11MDD Policy CC02MDD Policy CC03MDD Policy TB21MDD Policy TB23MDD Policy TB26
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 48Paragraph 54Paragraph 56Paragraph 61Paragraph 64Paragraph 79Paragraph 174Paragraph 179Paragraph 180Paragraph 203
Judgments
Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE [JPL 1982P37]

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

32 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Wokingham Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed21 July 20266008845
    Pound Lane Cottage, Pound Lane, Hurst, RG10 0RS
  2. Dismissed9 March 20263361360
    Land West of Limmerhill Road, Wokingham, RG41 4BY
  3. Allowed2 February 20263375029
    1 Halstead Close, Woodley, Wokingham, Berkshire, RG5 4LD
  4. Allowed26 November 20253363174
    178 Bearwood Road, Barkham, Wokingham, RG41 4SH
  5. Dismissed27 October 20253364902
    Land East of Warren Lodge, Warren Lane, Finchampstead, RG40 4HR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.