Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed17 November 20223280458

Sugglers Hyde, Brook Lane, Corfe Mullen, Wimborne, BH21 3RD

Planning appeal 3280458 at Sugglers Hyde, Brook Lane, Corfe Mullen, Wimborne, BH21 3RD (Dorset) was dismissed on 17 November 2022 by Inspector O'Brien L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposals on the character and appearance of the area.

demolish remaining section of existing dwelling, garage and erect a replacement dwelling on the northern side of the site. As per attached plans D8044B1-002 to 005 INCLUSIVE

Authority
Dorset
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
O'Brien L
Postcode
BH21 3RD

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposals on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether or not the proposals would provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers with particular regard to outlook and light

What decided it

In Appeals A and B, the failure to provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers due to poor outlook and light from basement bedrooms; in Appeal C, the combined harm from the car port's visual impact on character and appearance and the poor outlook from lower ground floor bedrooms.

In Appeal A, the substantial harm from unsatisfactory living conditions outweighed the moderate benefits of housing provision and efficient land use. In Appeals B and C, the substantial harm to character and appearance combined with substantial harm to living conditions outweighed the limited cumulative benefits of the schemes.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy HE2 of the Christchurch and East Dorset Local Plan Part 1 Core Strategy

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

45 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Dorset

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266010776
    The Bothey, Clayford, Wimborne, BH21 7BJ
  2. Dismissed23 October 20266014673
    52 St Mary Street, Weymouth, DT4 8BJ
  3. Dismissed22 October 20266012104
    Papushka Fields, Dorchester Rd,, Lytchett Minster, BH16 6FE
  4. Dismissed22 October 20266011513
    Field View Barn, Fishey Lane, West Orchard, SP7 0LQ
  5. Allowed21 October 20266010895
    Land off Dukes Close, Martinstown, DT2 9TU

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.