Planning appeal decision
Safe Regeneration Ltd, Waverley Street, Bootle, L20 4AP
Planning appeal 3281083 at Safe Regeneration Ltd, Waverley Street, Bootle, L20 4AP (Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 13 September 2022 by Inspector Woodwards O, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether or not the proposed development would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupants, with regard to the provision of outdoor amenity space.
Three-phased mixed-use development of the SAFE St Mary's complex and adjoining land comprising an arts hub, canal-side pods, remodelling of the Lock and Quay public house into bed & breakfast/serviced apartments/commercial unit (phase one), mixed-tenure housing of 41 townhouses and 66 apartments with a substation (phase two), and outline permission for an 80-bed extra care facility with community hairdressing salon and cafe (phase three)
- Authority
- Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Woodwards O
- Postcode
- L20 4AP
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether or not the proposed development would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupants, with regard to the provision of outdoor amenity space
- the effect of the proposal upon the local highway network, with regard to on-street car parking and highway safety
- whether or not the proposal represents 'over-development'
What decided it
The proposal represented over-development of the site, resulting in unacceptable outdoor amenity space and living conditions for future residential occupants, which outweighed the scheme's benefits.
Significant positive weight given to economic benefits, publicly accessible canal-side open space, moderate weight to biodiversity net gain and low carbon commitments, and limited weight to cycle/car club provision, but this was outweighed by the significant harm from over-development and inadequate future living conditions, meaning the proposal failed to comply with the development plan as a whole.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy EQ2Policy HC3Policy EQ3Policy HC4
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 57Paragraph 107Paragraph 111Paragraph 124
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Sefton
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Allowed1 September 2026601039741a Liverpool Road, Birkdale, Southport, PR8 4AG
- Allowed5 March 20266001901151 Bedford Road, Bootle, L20 2DR
- Allowed11 July 20253362642Land Between Merton Hotel and S Hughes House, Stanley Road, Bootle, L20 3AZ
- Allowed10 June 20253355665Land to the North of Sentinel Way, Sefton, L30 1TB
- Dismissed20 February 2025335871226 Little Crosby Road, Great Crosby, Liverpool, L23 2TG
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®