Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed6 December 20223281602

Land to the North of School Road, Ringsfield, NR34 8NZ

Planning appeal 3281602 at Land to the North of School Road, Ringsfield, NR34 8NZ (East Suffolk) was allowed on 6 December 2022 by Inspector Simpson L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the appeal site is capable of accommodating the quantum of development proposed and in particular, its resultant effect on the character and appearance of the surrounding area.

Erection of up to 33 dwellings, open space, landscaping, visitor car park and site access from School Road

Authority
East Suffolk
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Simpson L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the appeal site is capable of accommodating the quantum of development proposed and in particular, its resultant effect on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
  • The effect of the proposed development on the integrity of European Sites

What decided it

The proposed development complies with the development plan taken as a whole, particularly the allocation and requirements of Policy WLP 7.14, and the necessary mitigation for European Sites effects is properly secured through the s.106 agreement.

The significant social and economic benefits of providing 33 dwellings (30% affordable) and boosting housing supply, consistent with the Framework's emphasis, outweighed any concerns about character and appearance, which could be adequately addressed through reserved matters and conditions.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy WLP 7.14Policy WLP 8.2Policy WLP 8.3Policy WLP 8.30Policy WLP 8.31Policy WLP 8.7
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 57Paragraph 126Paragraph 130Paragraph 134
Judgments
Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE [JPL 1982 P37]; R (Harvey) v Mendip District Council [2017] EWCA Civ 1784

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

3 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in East Suffolk

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed24 August 20266009815
    115 Oulton Road, Lowestoft, NR32 4QW
  2. Allowed5 August 20266004646
    Easton Bavents Ltd, Larks Rising, Reydon, IP18 6SS
  3. Allowed16 July 20266007778
    Land South Of Felixstowe Road, Stratton Hall, Felixstowe, IP11 0SQ
  4. Dismissed18 May 20266003227
    61 Hollow Grove Way, Carlton Colville, Lowestoft, Suffolk, NR338NS
  5. Dismissed13 May 20266005314
    43 St John's Road, Lowestoft, NR33 0PH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.