Planning appeal decision
43 St John's Road, Lowestoft, NR33 0PH
Planning appeal 6005314 at 43 St John's Road, Lowestoft, NR33 0PH (East Suffolk) was dismissed on 13 May 2026 by Inspector Phillips A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed development would provide suitable living conditions for future occupiers, with regard to the provision of private amenity space.
Extension of detached property to form three storey dwelling
- Authority
- East Suffolk
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Phillips A
- Postcode
- NR33 0PH
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposed development would provide suitable living conditions for future occupiers, with regard to the provision of private amenity space
- Whether there are reasonably available sites appropriate for the proposed development in areas at lower risk of flooding
- The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of 44 St Johns Road (No.44), with particular reference to loss of sunlight/daylight
- Whether the proposed development would have access to suitable car parking and the effect of the use of the proposed development on the safety of pedestrians using St Johns Road
- The effect of the proposal on the integrity of the features of European nature conservation sites situated along the Suffolk coast
What decided it
The proposal has not demonstrated that there are reasonably available sites for the proposed development in areas at lower risk of flooding and provides an unacceptable risk to future occupants, combined with the lack of suitable private amenity space for future occupiers.
The benefits of housing delivery and visual improvement to the character of the area were outweighed by the strong reasons for refusal arising from flood risk (failure of the sequential test and lack of an Emergency Flood Plan) and inadequate private amenity space, such that the proposal failed to meet the exception test under NPPF paragraph 11(d)(ii).
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy WLP8.33Policy WLP8.29Policy WLP8.24Policy WLP1.2Policy WLP8.21
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 135Paragraph 170Paragraph 174Paragraph 124Paragraph 125Paragraph 129Paragraph 78Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in East Suffolk
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed24 August 20266009815115 Oulton Road, Lowestoft, NR32 4QW
- Allowed5 August 20266004646Easton Bavents Ltd, Larks Rising, Reydon, IP18 6SS
- Dismissed18 May 2026600322761 Hollow Grove Way, Carlton Colville, Lowestoft, Suffolk, NR338NS
- Dismissed9 April 20266003042Land Adjacent to 132, Mill Lane,, Felixstowe, Suffolk, IP11 2LL
- Allowed2 April 20266002986Wood Farm Barn, Helmingham Road, Otley, Suffolk, IP6 9NS
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®