Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed21 January 20223281771

5 Masefield Close, ERITH, DA8 2DG

described in the application form as a “single storey (side and front) extension with flat warm roof

Authority
London Borough of Bexley
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Shrimplin R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host building and its surroundings
  • The effect of the proposed development on the residential amenities of neighbours (whether unacceptable harm would be caused by overbearing appearance)

What decided it

The harmful visual effect of the pitched roof feature on the front elevation and the over-intrusive appearance of the extension on the boundary, combined with undue visual impact on neighbouring residential amenities, outweighed the benefits of the development.

Plan policies cited: ENV39, H9

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.