Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 April 20223282241

163-187 High St, Bottisham, Cambridgeshire, CB25 9BB

Planning appeal 3282241 at 163-187 High St, Bottisham, Cambridgeshire, CB25 9BB (East Cambridgeshire District Council) was dismissed on 7 April 2022 by Inspector Woodwards O, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, in particular the character and setting of Bottisham village and the character and landscape of the surrounding countryside.

the development of a retirement care village in use class C2 comprising housing with care, communal health, wellbeing and leisure facilities; and use class C3 affordable dwellings (compromising up to 30% on-site provision), public open space, play provision, landscaping, car parking, access and associated development

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Other Major Developments
Inspector
Woodwards O

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, in particular the character and setting of Bottisham village and the character and landscape of the surrounding countryside
  • the effect of the proposal on healthcare
  • whether any harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the 'very special circumstances' required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The Inspector could not be satisfied that no suitable, available and deliverable non-Green Belt alternative sites existed because the appellant's Alternative Sites Assessment was found not to be robust, meaning the substantial benefits did not clearly outweigh the Green Belt and other harm.

The substantial benefits of affordable and extra care housing, general housing supply, employment and biodiversity gains did not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt (by reason of inappropriateness and to openness), the significant negative weight given to the deficient Alternative Sites Assessment, and the lesser harms to character, appearance and heritage assets, so very special circumstances did not exist.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy ENV 1Policy ENV 2Policy ENV 10Policy HOU 1Policy HOU 4Policy HOU 6Policy GROWTH 1Policy GROWTH 2
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 149Paragraph 137Paragraph 138Paragraph 142Paragraph 144Paragraph 148Paragraph 174Paragraph 79Paragraph 60Paragraph 62Paragraph 81Paragraph 120Paragraph 202

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

10 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in East Cambridgeshire

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed3 July 20253366683
    19 Millfield Lane , Wilburton , Ely , Cambridgeshire , CB6 3SD
  2. Allowed13 February 20243324141
    Land to the Rear of 163 to 187 High Street and East of Rowan Close, Bottisham, CB25 9BJ
  3. Dismissed26 April 20223281803
    Chalk Farm, Newmarket Road, Bottisham, Cambridge, CB25 9BD
  4. Dismissed16 October 20266009201
    Rose Garden Cottege, 13 Soham Road, Fordham, Ely, CB7 5LD
  5. Allowed14 October 20266012656
    Land North East Of 70 St Johns Avenue, Newmarket, CB8 8DE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.