Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed22 March 20223282252

92 Church Road, Addlestone, KT15 1SG

Planning appeal 3282252 at 92 Church Road, Addlestone, KT15 1SG (Runnymede Borough Council) was dismissed on 22 March 2022 by Inspector McDonagh C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.

construction of 3 no. three bedroom houses with integral garages, amenity space and landscaping, together with continuation of the existing vehicular access to the side of no. 92 Church Road

Authority
Runnymede Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
McDonagh C
Postcode
KT15 1SG

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • The living conditions of occupiers of adjacent properties and future occupiers of the proposed dwellings

What decided it

The loss of the healthy, mature beech tree subject to a Tree Preservation Order, which makes a significant and positive contribution to the character and appearance of the area, substantially outweighs the benefits of providing 3 additional dwellings.

The adverse impacts of the development, particularly the loss of the beech tree, significantly outweigh the benefits of housing delivery when assessed against the policies in the Local Plan and the aims of the Framework.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy EE1Policy EE9Policy EE11
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 130Paragraph 131

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

72 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Runnymede Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266012183
    1-3 Part First Floor, New Haw Road, Addlestone, KT15 2BZ
  2. Dismissed29 October 20266006748
    St Merryns Copse, Chobham Road, Ottershaw, KT16 0QE
  3. decided12 October 20266007528
    Land Known to the West of 203-221 New Haw Road, Addlestone, KT15 2DP
  4. Dismissed12 October 20266006766
    Land to the West of, 203 - 221 New Haw Road, Addlestone, KT15 2DP
  5. Allowed8 October 20266014548
    12 Caxton Avenue, Addlestone, KT15 1LJ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.