Kingway, Firgrove, Milnrow, Rochdale, Ol16 4AP

Planning appeal 3282674 at Kingway, Firgrove, Milnrow, Rochdale, Ol16 4AP (Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 24 January 2022 by Inspector Ellison H, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area and, if any harm would occur, whether this is outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed taking into account any suitable alternatives.

a 15.0m Phase 8 Monopole C/W wraparound Cabinet at base and associated ancillary works

Authority: Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council
Appeal type: minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure: Written Representations
Development: telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector: Ellison H
Postcode: OL16 4AP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area and, if any harm would occur, whether this is outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed taking into account any suitable alternatives

What decided it

The siting and appearance of the proposal would cause significant harm to the character and appearance of the area by creating an unduly prominent and incongruous feature in an open part of the street scene, and this harm was not outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed given insufficient evidence of exhaustive alternative site assessment.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies: Rochdale Adopted Core Strategy, October 2016 - design quality aim
National Planning Policy Framework: Paragraph 117

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

64 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision

An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter — Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.

Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app — Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.

Start your free trial

More decisions in Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

Allowed18 March 20253353275
Footway of Hollin Lane , Middleton, Manchester, M34 5LE
Dismissed4 February 20253346812
Sheriff Street, Rochdale , OL12 6QR
Allowed29 May 20243326368
Telecommunications Site, Jape Business Park, Dell Road, Rochdale, OL12 6BZ
Allowed25 April 20243328202
Hamer Lane Street Works, Hamer Lane, Rochdale, OL16 2LU
Dismissed12 April 20243323005
Area of Footpath, Hogarth Road and Daventry Road Junction Adjacent to No. 2 Hogarth Road, Rochdale, OL11 2QS

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.