Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed1 November 20223282825

Garages and associated hard standing accessed , between 66 and 64 Waverley Road , Oxshott, KT20 0RZ

to demolish the existing rank of 22 garages and build 4 maisonettes with associated parking and landscaping

Authority
Elmbridge Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Buchanan R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the future occupiers of the proposed maisonettes and the existing occupiers of Nos 62 and 64 Waverley Road would be at unacceptable risk from flooding
  • whether the proposal would make provision for climate change mitigation
  • its effect on car parking for residents of nearby houses

What decided it

The Council's inability to demonstrate a 5-year housing land supply engaged the tilted balance under paragraph 11(d) of the Framework, and the absence of any adverse impacts that would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits of the proposal meant the presumption in favour of sustainable development applied.

The benefits of housing delivery and the provision of affordable housing through the unilateral undertaking, supported by the Council's evidence of serious market housing affordability problems and substantial unmet affordable housing need, outweighed the Framework's general position against affordable housing in minor residential developments, and the proposal accords with the development plan overall with no adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighing its benefits.

Framework references: 11

Plan policies cited: CS Policy CS26, DMP Policy DM2, CS Policy CS21

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.