Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed26 April 20223282849

28 Halsham Crescent, BARKING, IG11 9HG

a single storey rear extension extending 6m from beyond the rear wall of the original dwellinghouse no more than 3m in height at eaves and 3m at highest point

Authority
London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Douglas L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether prior approval is required, with specific regard to whether any owner or occupier of any adjoining premises has objected to the proposed development
  • If any owner or occupier of any adjoining premises has objected to the proposed development, the impact of the proposed development on the amenity of any adjoining premises

What decided it

The neighbour's comments, although raising concerns about loss of natural light, explicitly stated 'I have no objection to the extension', and therefore did not constitute an objection triggering the requirement for prior approval under paragraph A.4(7) of Class A.

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.