®Planning appeal decision
27 Blake Hall Crescent, London, E11 3RH
Planning appeal 3283173 at 27 Blake Hall Crescent, London, E11 3RH (London Borough of Redbridge) was allowed on 4 January 2022 by Inspector Andrews M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character or appearance of the dwelling; the semi-detached pair, and the Aldersbrook and Lake House Estate Conservation Area with particular reference to the hip to gable extension; the loss of a chimney stack, and the addition of the rear dormer.
a hip to gable roof extension with a rear dormer
- Authority
- London Borough of Redbridge
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Andrews M
- Postcode
- E11 3RH
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposal on the character or appearance of the dwelling; the semi-detached pair, and the Aldersbrook and Lake House Estate Conservation Area with particular reference to the hip to gable extension; the loss of a chimney stack, and the addition of the rear dormer
What decided it
The existing context of the locality, including the prevalence of gable roofs in Blake Hall Crescent and the prior alteration to the adjacent semi-detached property, meant that the hip to gable extension would have a neutral effect on the conservation area, and any less than substantial harm from the rear dormer would be outweighed by the public benefit of improved housing.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- LP26LP30LP33D4HC1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 16
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision
More decisions in London Borough of Redbridge
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed19 May 20253360800112 Wanstead Park Avenue, Wanstead, London, E12 5EF
- Allowed8 February 2024332797720 Kirkland Avenue, Clayhall, Ilford, IG5 0TQ
- Dismissed3 November 20213279215100 Levett Gardens, Ilford, IG3 9BX
- Dismissed2 November 2021328083319 Whitehall Lane, Buckhurst Hill, IG9 5JH
- Quashed On Legal Grounds29 September 20263372674Land at 112 Highbury Gardens , Seven King , Ilford , IG3 8AA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.