Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed8 June 20223283227

101 and 103 Perth Road, LONDON, N22 5QG

‘erection of part single, part two-storey side and rear extensions to accommodate the change of use of the buildings to four flats’

Authority
London Borough of Haringey
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Russell M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the host dwellings are suitable for conversion to flats having regard to the requirements of Policy DM16 of the DPD
  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring dwellings

What decided it

The harm to character and appearance, the detrimental effect on neighbouring outlook, and the potential adverse impact on on-street parking significantly and demonstrably outweighed the modest housing benefits when assessed against the policies of the Framework as a whole.

The adverse impacts of harm to character and appearance, harm to neighbouring outlook, and potential intensification of on-street parking demand significantly and demonstrably outweighed the identified benefits of modest housing delivery and contribution to housing mix when assessed against the policies of the Framework as a whole.

Framework references: 126, 130, 11

Plan policies cited: Policy DM16 (Residential Conversions) of the Haringey Development Management DPD (2017), Policy 6 (Housing quality and standards) of the London Plan 2021, Policy SP11 (Design) of the Haringey Local Plan Strategic Policies (2013, with alterations 2017), Policy DM1 (Delivering High Quality Design) of the DPD, Policy DM12 (Housing Design and Quality) of the DPD

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.