Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed26 January 20223283314

30 Hartland Drive, RUISLIP, HA4 0TQ

described on the application form as ‘double storey side extension, single storey rear extension as approved (Ref: 9982/APP/2021/1058), rear dormer extension with Juliet balcony and 3 x front facing rooflights

Authority
London Borough of Hillingdon
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Price A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
  • whether the proposed development would provide a sufficient private garden space in the interests of the living conditions of existing occupiers

What decided it

The two-storey side extension would fill the existing break between the property and its neighbour, appearing as part of the original property rather than a subservient addition, thereby failing to respect the established streetscape rhythm of gaps between terraces and causing detrimental impact on character and appearance.

Plan policies cited: DMHB11, DMHB12, DMHBD1, DMHB18, DMHD1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.