Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed24 May 20223283598

Apps Court Farm , Hurst Road, Walton-on-Thames, Surrey , KT12 2EG

Planning appeal 3283598 at Apps Court Farm , Hurst Road, Walton-on-Thames, Surrey , KT12 2EG (Elmbridge Borough Council) was dismissed on 24 May 2022 by Inspector Woolcock J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development conflicts with policy to protect the Green Belt and the effects of the proposed development on the openness of the Green Belt.

the erection of a two-storey extension to archery building

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Minor retail and services
Inspector
Woolcock J
Postcode
KT12 2EG

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the development conflicts with policy to protect the Green Belt and the effects of the proposed development on the openness of the Green Belt
  • The effects of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • If the development is inappropriate in the Green Belt, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The proposed extension would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would harm openness and character, and the benefits of improved sporting facilities did not clearly outweigh this harm to constitute very special circumstances.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
CS Policy CS17DMP Policy DM2DMP Policy DM18
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 145Paragraph 149

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

140 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Elmbridge Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed7 August 20266004985
    4, Felix Lane, Shepperton Surrey, TW17 8NJ
  2. Dismissed16 July 20266007665
    Whitewood, Redhill Road, Cobham, KT11 1EF
  3. Dismissed29 June 20266007101
    The Cottage, Byfleet Road, Cobham, KT111DS
  4. Dismissed4 June 20266006584
    Hillsway, Downside Common Road,, Downside, Cobham, KT11 3NP
  5. Dismissed9 March 20263356517
    Silvermere Golf Club, Redhill Road, Cobham, Surrey, KT11 1EF

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.