Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed4 July 20223283840

Tattenham Crescent Streetworks, Tattenham Crescent, Epsom Downs, Surrey, KT18 5QJ

Planning appeal 3283840 at Tattenham Crescent Streetworks, Tattenham Crescent, Epsom Downs, Surrey, KT18 5QJ (Reigate and Banstead Borough Council) was dismissed on 4 July 2022 by Inspector Buchanan R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the character and appearance of the area.

the installation of a 20 metre high monopole supporting 6 no. antennas and 2 no. transmission dishes, 4 no. equipment cabinets and development works ancillary thereto

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector
Buchanan R
Postcode
KT18 5QJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the character and appearance of the area
  • if any harm would be caused, whether this is outweighed by the need to site the installation in the location proposed, taking into account any suitable alternatives

What decided it

The unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the area caused by the height and bulk of the monopole's upper section and the extent and design of the equipment cabinets could not be outweighed by the need to site the installation in this location and the absence of suitable alternatives.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy NHE1Policy DES1Policy INF3

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

97 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Reigate and Banstead Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Allowed6 March 20243324000
    Redhill Bowling Club Ltd, St. Annes Drive, Redhill, RH1 1AU
  2. Allowed8 February 20243325073
    Bridge Industrial Estate, Balcombe Road, Horley, RH6 9HZ
  3. Allowed15 January 20243314614
    Field West of Reigate Road , (Opposite Moleside, 9 Reigate Road), Sidlow, Surrey, RH2 8QH
  4. Dismissed9 March 20233289955
    Nork Community Centre Car Park, Nork Community Centre, Nork Way, Banstead, Surrey, SM7 1JN
  5. Dismissed15 February 20233287724
    Chipstead Way, Woodmansterne, Surrey, SM7 3NW

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.