Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision25 January 20223284155

35 Claydon Drive, CROYDON, CR0 4QX

front and rear extensions

Authority
London Borough of Sutton
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Lawrence E

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host property, the street scene and the surrounding area
  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of 33 and 37 Claydon Drive, with particular regard to visual impact

What decided it

The front extension's design respects the host dwelling and street scene characteristics and would not materially harm neighbours' living conditions, whereas the rear extension's excessive bulk and prominence would unacceptably harm character and appearance and neighbours' outlook.

Plan policies cited: Policy 28, Policy 29, Supplementary Planning Document 4: The Design of Residential Extensions, Supplementary Planning Document 14: Creating Locally Distinctive Places

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.