Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 July 20223284392

9 Beulah Walk, Woldingham, Caterham, Surrey, CR3 7LN

the erection of replacement building including demolition of all existing buildings, sheds, garages and other outbuildings on site; new dwelling on two storeys (part sunken into the land slope) to incorporate an upper floor small balcony overlooking open countryside to rear, and hardstanding to facilitate formation of front driveway, together with a single storey side area sunken into the ground with a green roof

Authority
Tandridge District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Ollerenshaw M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the development plan and the National Planning Policy Framework
  • The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • The effect of the proposal on ecology, including protected species
  • If it is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would harm openness and potentially affect protected species, and the limited weight given to other considerations does not clearly outweigh these harms to amount to very special circumstances.

Framework references: 147, 148, 149

Plan policies cited: Policy DP10, Policy DP13, Policy CSP17, Policy DP19

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.