Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed30 December 20213284473

Walkers Yard, Kent Road, Pudsey, LS28 9HG

Planning appeal 3284473 at Walkers Yard, Kent Road, Pudsey, LS28 9HG (Leeds City Council) was dismissed on 30 December 2021 by Inspector Caines A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal amounts to inappropriate development in the Green Belt.

a new bungalow dwelling with attic bedrooms and associated parking and external garden areas

Authority
Leeds City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Caines A
Postcode
LS28 9HG

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal amounts to inappropriate development in the Green Belt
  • If the proposal is inappropriate development, whether harm by reason of inappropriateness and any other harm is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the proposal

What decided it

The harm to the Green Belt from inappropriate development and encroachment into open countryside was not clearly outweighed by the limited social and economic benefits of providing one additional dwelling.

The substantial harm to the Green Belt from inappropriate development and encroachment was not clearly outweighed by the limited social and economic benefits of the proposal, so very special circumstances did not exist to justify approval.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy N33 of the Leeds Unitary Development Plan (Review 2006) Volume 1: Written StatementPolicy H2(iii) of the Leeds Core Strategy (as amended by the Core Strategy Selective Review 2019)
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 149Paragraph 148

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

49 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Leeds City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Allowed13 October 20266011132
    Rei House Stables, Ripley Lane, Guiseley, LS20 9NY
  2. Dismissed12 October 20266011503
    Craven Bank, Harewood Road, Leeds, LS17 9HL
  3. Dismissed27 August 20266009680
    The Bradford Golf Club, Hawksworth Lane, Guiseley, LS208NP
  4. Allowed12 August 20266005793
    Breary Grange Farm, Kings Road, Leeds, LS16 9JN
  5. Dismissed24 July 20266006233
    Uplands Cottage, Back Lane, Leeds, LS12 5HL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.