Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed30 December 20213284473

Walkers Yard, Kent Road, PUDSEY, LS28 9HG

a new bungalow dwelling with attic bedrooms and associated parking and external garden areas

Authority
Leeds City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Caines A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal amounts to inappropriate development in the Green Belt
  • If the proposal is inappropriate development, whether harm by reason of inappropriateness and any other harm is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the proposal

What decided it

The harm to the Green Belt from inappropriate development and encroachment into open countryside was not clearly outweighed by the limited social and economic benefits of providing one additional dwelling.

The substantial harm to the Green Belt from inappropriate development and encroachment was not clearly outweighed by the limited social and economic benefits of the proposal, so very special circumstances did not exist to justify approval.

Framework references: 149, 148

Plan policies cited: Policy N33 of the Leeds Unitary Development Plan (Review 2006) Volume 1: Written Statement, Policy H2(iii) of the Leeds Core Strategy (as amended by the Core Strategy Selective Review 2019)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.