Planning appeal decision
Land R/O 800 Uxbridge Road, Hayes, UB4 0RS
Planning appeal 3285053 at Land R/O 800 Uxbridge Road, Hayes, UB4 0RS (London Borough of Hillingdon) was dismissed on 23 February 2022 by Inspector Wraight G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, the setting of the Hayes Village Conservation Area (CA) and the setting of the locally listed Adam and Eve Public House (PH).
the replacement of existing rear car park with new car park and erection of a residential building with basement parking to accommodate 19 new dwellings with associated access, parking, bins and cycle provision
- Authority
- London Borough of Hillingdon
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Wraight G
- Postcode
- UB4 0RS
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, the setting of the Hayes Village Conservation Area (CA) and the setting of the locally listed Adam and Eve Public House (PH)
- Whether acceptable living conditions would be provided for the future occupants
- Whether the proposal makes adequate provision for larger homes
What decided it
The harm to the character and appearance of the area and the setting of the Hayes Village Conservation Area, which carries considerable importance and weight, was not outweighed by the moderate benefits of housing delivery.
The moderate benefits of providing 19 new dwellings did not outweigh the significant harm to character and appearance, the less than substantial harm to the conservation area setting, the harm to the setting of the locally listed building, and the failure to provide acceptable living conditions and an appropriate housing mix.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy D1 of the London Plan 2021Policy D2 of the London Plan 2021Policy D3 of the London Plan 2021Policy D6 of the London Plan 2021Policy D8 of the London Plan 2021Policy H10 of the London Plan 2021Policy HE1 of the Local Plan: Part 1 Strategic Policies 2012Policy BE1 of the Local Plan: Part 1 Strategic Policies 2012Policy DMH 2 of the Local Plan: Part 1 Strategic Policies 2012Policy DMHB 1 of the Local Plan: Part 2 Development Management Policies 2020Policy DMHB 3 of the Local Plan: Part 2 Development Management Policies 2020Policy DMHB 4 of the Local Plan: Part 2 Development Management Policies 2020Policy DMHB 10 of the Local Plan: Part 2 Development Management Policies 2020Policy DMHB 11 of the Local Plan: Part 2 Development Management Policies 2020Policy DMHB 12 of the Local Plan: Part 2 Development Management Policies 2020Policy DMHB 16 of the Local Plan: Part 2 Development Management Policies 2020Policy DMHB 18 of the Local Plan: Part 2 Development Management Policies 2020
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 202
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Hillingdon
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed27 October 202660153104 Albany Close, Ickenham, UB10 8QW
- Dismissed27 October 2026600985618-20 Wilmar Close, Hayes, UB4 8ET
- Dismissed21 October 2026601178225 Stirling Road, Hayes, UB3 3AH
- Dismissed19 October 20266011268364 Victoria Road, Ruislip, HA4 0ET
- Allowed6 October 2026601385888 Stormount Drive, Hayes, UB3 1RH
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®