Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed27 October 20223285275

27 Old Clements Lane, Haverhill, CB9 8JR

Planning appeal 3285275 at 27 Old Clements Lane, Haverhill, CB9 8JR (West Suffolk) was allowed on 27 October 2022 by Inspector Berry A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.

demolition of existing dwelling and associated garage and erection of three new dwellings on land at 27, Old Clements Lane, Haverhill

Authority
West Suffolk
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Berry A
Postcode
CB9 8HD

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether the existing dwelling comprises a non-designated heritage asset, and if so, whether there is clear justification for its loss when weighed against any benefits

What decided it

The combination of clear justification for the loss of the non-designated heritage asset (financial unviability of refurbishment and the genuine fallback position of likely demolition) outweighed by substantial public benefits of new housing provision, together with the absence of harm to character and appearance.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DM2Policy DM22Policy CS3Policy DM16Policy DM12Policy DM7
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 203

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

19 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in West Suffolk

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed2 July 20266006355
    Laurel Farm, Sandy Drove, Lakenheath, IP27 9GT
  2. Allowed29 June 20266007055
    All Saints Hotel, The Street, Fornham St Genevieve, Bury St Edmunds, IP28 6JQ
  3. Allowed17 June 20266005559
    Land Opposite 'Mandarin' and Adj to South View, Wilde St, Beck Row, Mildenhall, IP28 8BL
  4. Allowed17 June 20266004217
    The Coal Yard, Wilde Street, Beck Row, IP28 8BL
  5. Dismissed11 March 20266002107
    85 Kings Road, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, IP33 3DS

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.