Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed24 May 20223285647

Kings Carpets, 129 High Road, Beeston, Nottingham, NG9 2LL

Planning appeal 3285647 at Kings Carpets, 129 High Road, Beeston, Nottingham, NG9 2LL (Broxtowe Borough Council) was dismissed on 24 May 2022 by Inspector McDonagh C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effects of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.

Construct 4 storey building to contain 9 Houses of Multiple Occupation providing a total of 54 bedrooms. Change of use class from A1 to C4.

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
McDonagh C
Postcode
NG9 2LL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effects of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • The effects of the proposal on the living conditions of occupiers of neighbouring dwellings
  • The effects of the proposal on on-street parking provision

What decided it

The substantial harm to character and appearance, which carries considerable weight against the scheme, outweighs the socio-economic benefits of bringing a brownfield site back into use and providing student accommodation in a sustainable location.

The socio-economic benefits of student accommodation on a brownfield site in a sustainable location were outweighed by the substantial harm to character and appearance, with no harm to living conditions and parking being neutral rather than beneficial.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 10 of the Greater Nottingham Aligned Core Strategy Part 1 Local Plan (ACS)Policy 17 of the Broxtowe Borough Council Part 2 Local Plan (LP)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

82 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Broxtowe

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Allowed10 July 20266007579
    12-14 Moore Gate, Beeston, NG9 1FX
  2. Allowed27 February 20266000872
    Land to the Rear of 137-141 Queens Road, Beeston, Nottingham, NG9 2EX
  3. Allowed5 February 20263369761
    72-78 Nottingham Road, Stapleford, NG9 8AQ
  4. Dismissed20 October 20253367461
    98 Dennis Avenue, Beeston, Nottinghamshire, NG9 2RE
  5. Dismissed15 September 20253363990
    Land to the North of Beeston Lock, Riverside Road, Beeston , NG9 1NR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.