Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision13 December 20213285702

34 Hillgate Place, LONDON, W8 7ST

a mansard roof extension and lead covered dormers with timber framed sash windows, and replacement of non-original railings to match the existing railings on the street

Authority
Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Hitchcock R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the existing building and the Kensington Conservation Area

What decided it

The mansard roof extension would interrupt the regular simple lines and consistent character of development on Hillgate Place, causing significant harm to the conservation area that was not outweighed by the identified benefits.

The significant harm to the character and appearance of the conservation area arising from the roof extension was not outweighed by the public benefit of replacing railings with original design or the economic benefits of construction.

Framework references: 199, 202

Plan policies cited: Policy CL1, Policy CL2, Policy CL3, Policy CL8, Policy CL11

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.