Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice upheld12 February 20243285804

Hill View Meadow Lane, Runwell, Wickford, SS11 7DX

Planning appeal 3285804 at Hill View Meadow Lane, Runwell, Wickford, SS11 7DX (Chelmsford Borough Council) was dismissed on 12 February 2024 by Inspector Harwood A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development is inappropriate development within the Green Belt having regard to the framework and relevant policies within the Local Plan.

Without planning permission, the construction of a building

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
gypsy-gypsy · Other minor developments
Inspector
Harwood A
Postcode
SS11 7DX

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the development is inappropriate development within the Green Belt having regard to the framework and relevant policies within the Local Plan
  • The effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt
  • If the development is inappropriate development, whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The substantial harm to the Green Belt through inappropriate development and loss of openness was not clearly outweighed by other considerations, and very special circumstances did not exist to justify the development.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DM6Policy S11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

52 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Chelmsford City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Notice upheld3 August 20263347259
    Land at The House, East Hanningfield Road, Sandon, Chelmsford, Essex, CM2 7TQ
  2. Planning permission granted28 July 20263337730
    Former Tennis Pavillion , The Old Rodney , Spring Elms Lane, Little Baddow, Chelmsford , CM3 4SD
  3. Dismissed28 July 20266007350
    Phillips Farm, Highwood Road, Highwood, CM1 3PX
  4. Split Decision1 July 20263377239
    Highfields Farm Barn, Highfields Mead, East Hanningfield, Chelmsford , Essex, CM3 8AW
  5. Dismissed18 May 20266006009
    Emilie, Stock Road, Ingatestone, CM4 9PQ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.