Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed2 November 20223285907

Land rear of 44 Dale Park Avenue, Carshalton, SM5 2EP

the erection of a two-storey, four- bedroom dwellinghouse with associated front and rear gardens, bin and bicycle storage and parking without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref DM2020/01574, dated 25 January 2021

Authority
London Borough of Sutton
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Glassar S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the disputed condition is reasonable and necessary to reduce the fear of crime
  • Whether the disputed condition is reasonable and necessary to provide a suitable access to the development with particular regard to protecting pedestrian safety

What decided it

The absence of substantive evidence of crime or fear of crime in the area, combined with the Metropolitan Police's confirmation that lighting was not required for Secured by Design Accreditation and the Highway Engineer's lack of objection, demonstrated that the lighting condition was not reasonably necessary for the stated planning purposes.

Plan policies cited: Policy D3 of the London Plan 2021, Policy D6 of the London Plan 2021, Policy D8 of the London Plan 2021

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.