®Planning appeal decision
23A Chestnut Close, HAYES, UB3 1JG
two storey, 2-bed, attached dwelling with associated parking and amenity space involving demolition of single storey detached garage to rear, without complying with conditions attached to planning permission Ref 70664/APP/2015/1774, dated 9 July 2015
- Authority
- London Borough of Hillingdon
- Appeal type
- householder · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Caines A
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the disputed conditions are necessary in order to protect the character and appearance of the area, and to safeguard the living conditions of neighbouring residents
What decided it
The absence of site-specific features, constraints or context that would warrant removal of permitted development rights, combined with the clear guidance in NPPF paragraph 54 and the PPG that such conditions must have clear justification.
Framework references: 54
Plan policies cited: Policy BE24, Policy OL5, Policy BE13, Policy BE21, Policy BE23, Policy BE1, Policy DMHB 11, Policy DMHB 12, Policy DMHD 1
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.