Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed21 March 20223286101

Southbrook Farm, Summerhill Lane, Hartlepool, TS25 4LL

erection of 14 no detached properties of 2, 3 and 4 bed on existing site which currently has a number of outbuildings and detached former farmhouse

Authority
Hartlepool Borough Council *
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Hunt S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effects of the proposed development on the integrity of nearby European sites with regard to increased recreational and dog walking activity
  • The effect of the proposed development on the setting of Park Conservation Area
  • The effect on living conditions of future occupiers with particular reference to outlook, in terms of the relationship with the adjacent telecommunications poles
  • Whether the proposals make adequate provision for infrastructure, social and ecology requirements arising from the development, and whether the contributions meet the tests set out in Regulation 122(2) of the Community Infrastructure Regulations 2010 (as amended)

What decided it

The failure to submit a completed Section 106 agreement securing the necessary planning obligations, particularly the £2,600 ecology mitigation contribution and the £156,000 highway infrastructure contribution, meant the development could not avoid an adverse effect on European sites and failed to make adequate provision for required infrastructure contributions.

The moderate benefits of housing delivery and regeneration of a semi-derelict site did not outweigh the harm arising from the lack of contributions to required planning obligations and the inability to mitigate effects on European sites.

Framework references: 202, 57

Plan policies cited: Policy NE1, Policy HE1, Policy HE3, Policy QP4, Policy QP1, Policy INF2, Policy LS1, Policy INF4

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.