Planning appeal decision
Southbrook Farm, Summerhill Lane, Hartlepool, TS25 4LL
Planning appeal 3286101 at Southbrook Farm, Summerhill Lane, Hartlepool, TS25 4LL (Hartlepool Borough Council *) was dismissed on 21 March 2022 by Inspector Hunt S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effects of the proposed development on the integrity of nearby European sites with regard to increased recreational and dog walking activity.
erection of 14 no detached properties of 2, 3 and 4 bed on existing site which currently has a number of outbuildings and detached former farmhouse
- Authority
- Hartlepool Borough Council *
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Hunt S
- Postcode
- TS25 4LL
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effects of the proposed development on the integrity of nearby European sites with regard to increased recreational and dog walking activity
- The effect of the proposed development on the setting of Park Conservation Area
- The effect on living conditions of future occupiers with particular reference to outlook, in terms of the relationship with the adjacent telecommunications poles
- Whether the proposals make adequate provision for infrastructure, social and ecology requirements arising from the development, and whether the contributions meet the tests set out in Regulation 122(2) of the Community Infrastructure Regulations 2010 (as amended)
What decided it
The failure to submit a completed Section 106 agreement securing the necessary planning obligations, particularly the £2,600 ecology mitigation contribution and the £156,000 highway infrastructure contribution, meant the development could not avoid an adverse effect on European sites and failed to make adequate provision for required infrastructure contributions.
The moderate benefits of housing delivery and regeneration of a semi-derelict site did not outweigh the harm arising from the lack of contributions to required planning obligations and the inability to mitigate effects on European sites.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy NE1Policy HE1Policy HE3Policy QP4Policy QP1Policy INF2Policy LS1Policy INF4
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 202Paragraph 57
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Hartlepool
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed17 September 2026600841014 Elm Grove, Hartlepool, TS26 8LZ
- Allowed28 August 2026601121258 Ryehill Gardens, Hartlepool, TS26 0JJ
- Dismissed21 April 2026600379143 Kildale Grove, Hartlepool, County Durham, TS25 2AG
- Dismissed30 March 20263356466Low Throston House, Netherby Gate, Hart Lane, Hartlepool, TS26 0LF
- Notice varied and upheld30 March 20263344250Netherby Gate, Hart Lane, Hartlepool, TS26 0LF
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®