Planning appeal decision
Allowed11 February 20223286191
Vita Student, 13 Jack Rosenthal Street, Manchester, M15 4RB
- Authority
- Manchester City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- telecoms · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Wilson L
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposal upon the character and appearance of the host building and surrounding area, and whether any harm would be outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed taking into account suitable alternatives
What decided it
The absence of a suitable alternative site, combined with the technical and operational constraints requiring the proposed siting, means the need for the installation outweighs the limited harm to character and appearance.
Framework references: 117
Plan policies cited: Policy DC17, Policy DM1, Policy SP1, Policy EN3, Policy CC9
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®