Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed28 March 20223286219

Breezelands, Walton Bay, Clevedon, BS21 7AZ

Planning appeal 3286219 at Breezelands, Walton Bay, Clevedon, BS21 7AZ (North Somerset Council) was dismissed on 28 March 2022 by Inspector Tucker A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the site is suitable for residential development, having regard to its location, land use and amount of development, with particular regard to: (a) whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies; (b) the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt; (c) whether the site would be suitably located for the development proposed, having regard to local and national planning policies and its proximity to local services and facilities; and (d) whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, and if so, whether these would amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the proposal.

permission in principle for the erection of a single dwelling

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Tucker A
Postcode
BS21 7AZ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the site is suitable for residential development, having regard to its location, land use and amount of development, with particular regard to: (a) whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies; (b) the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt; (c) whether the site would be suitably located for the development proposed, having regard to local and national planning policies and its proximity to local services and facilities; and (d) whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, and if so, whether these would amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt with no very special circumstances to justify it, and the site is unsustainably located outside the settlement boundary with future occupiers dependent on private cars.

The modest benefits of housing delivery and economic benefits were outweighed by the substantial harm to the Green Belt from inappropriate development and the conflict with the Council's settlement strategy requiring strict control of countryside development

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DM12 of the North Somerset Sites and Policies Plan Part 1 2016Policy CS1 of the North Somerset Council Core Strategy 2017Policy CS13 of the North Somerset Council Core Strategy 2017Policy CS14 of the North Somerset Council Core Strategy 2017Policy CS33 of the North Somerset Council Core Strategy 2017Policy SA2 of the Sites and Policies Plan Part 2 Site Allocations Plan 2006-2026
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 138Paragraph 147Paragraph 149

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

11 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in North Somerset Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed9 October 20266011867
    Fairoaks, Cadbury Camp Lane, Clapton-in-Gordano, BS20 7SA
  2. Dismissed6 August 20266007743
    Former BT Radio Research Laboratory, Long Lane, Backwell, BS48 3DE
  3. Dismissed8 June 20266006387
    Pump House, Land off Kingston Lane, Winford, Bristol, BS40 8DA
  4. Dismissed11 November 20253366314
    Land to Southeast of Wood Lane, Clapton in Gordano, BS20 7RQ
  5. Dismissed26 September 20253365815
    Land to South of Orchard Lee, 7 Backwell Hill Road, Backwell, BS48 3PL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.