Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed11 May 20223286428

Burntstump Farm, Arnold, NG5 8PG

Change of Use from C3 (residential) to mixed use C3 (residential) and Sui Generis (breeding grooming and micro-chipping) and erection of fencing (part retrospective)”

Authority
Gedling Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Change of use
Inspector
Dean S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the revised Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect on the openness of the Green Belt
  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of occupiers of nearby properties with regard to the activities on the site
  • Would the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt with greater impact on openness than existing development, combined with unacceptable harm to neighbouring living conditions, and no very special circumstances to justify the development.

Framework references: 149

Plan policies cited: Policy 3 of the Greater Nottingham Broxtowe Borough, Gedling Borough, Nottingham City Aligned Core Strategies Part 1 Local Plan, Policy LPD15 of the Gedling Borough Local Planning Document Part 2 Local Plan, Policy 10 of the ACS, Policy LPD32 of the Part 2 Local Plan

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.