Planning appeal decision
Moat Farm, Baylham, Ipswich, Suffolk, IP6 8JW
application for ‘Planning Permission in Principle Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (Permission in Principle)(Amendment) Order 2017 - residential development of 1 to 4 dwellings
- Authority
- Mid Suffolk District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Price J
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the site is suitable for residential development, having regard to its location, the proposed land use and the amount of development
What decided it
The site's poor accessibility to services and facilities, requiring significant reliance on private car travel, means the adverse impacts of allowing housing would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the modest benefits, even applying the tilted balance under paragraph 11(d)(ii) of the Framework.
The modest social and economic benefits of housing delivery were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the adverse impacts of locating residential development in a poorly-served rural location with high car dependency, assessed against Framework policies as a whole
Framework references: 11, 105
Plan policies cited: CS1, CS2, LP H7
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®