Moat Farm, Baylham, Ipswich, Suffolk, IP6 8JW

Planning appeal 3286432 at Moat Farm, Baylham, Ipswich, Suffolk, IP6 8JW (Mid Suffolk District Council) was dismissed on 31 January 2023 by Inspector Price J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the site is suitable for residential development, having regard to its location, the proposed land use and the amount of development.

application for ‘Planning Permission in Principle Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (Permission in Principle)(Amendment) Order 2017 - residential development of 1 to 4 dwellings

Authority: Mid Suffolk District Council
Appeal type: minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure: Written Representations
Development: residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector: Price J
Postcode: IP6 8JW

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

Whether the site is suitable for residential development, having regard to its location, the proposed land use and the amount of development

What decided it

The site's poor accessibility to services and facilities, requiring significant reliance on private car travel, means the adverse impacts of allowing housing would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the modest benefits, even applying the tilted balance under paragraph 11(d)(ii) of the Framework.

The modest social and economic benefits of housing delivery were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the adverse impacts of locating residential development in a poorly-served rural location with high car dependency, assessed against Framework policies as a whole

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies: CS1CS2LP H7
National Planning Policy Framework: Paragraph 11Paragraph 105

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

13 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision

An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter — Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.

Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app — Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.

Start your free trial

More decisions in Mid Suffolk District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

Dismissed15 October 20266012038
The Stables, Bobby Hill, Wattisfield, IP22 1NL
Dismissed14 September 20266010281
1 Nursery Cottages, Barham, Ipswich, IP6 0PR
Dismissed8 September 20266010228
Land East of 52 Exeter Road, Claydon, Ipswich, IP6 0BP
Dismissed2 September 20263359620
Keytons Pit Newton Road, Sudbury, CO10 0PY
Quashed On Legal Grounds1 September 20263344278
Walnut Meadown, Back Lane, Baylham, Ipswich, IP6 8LE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.