Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed31 January 20233286432

Moat Farm, Baylham, Ipswich, Suffolk, IP6 8JW

application for ‘Planning Permission in Principle Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (Permission in Principle)(Amendment) Order 2017 - residential development of 1 to 4 dwellings

Authority
Mid Suffolk District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Price J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the site is suitable for residential development, having regard to its location, the proposed land use and the amount of development

What decided it

The site's poor accessibility to services and facilities, requiring significant reliance on private car travel, means the adverse impacts of allowing housing would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the modest benefits, even applying the tilted balance under paragraph 11(d)(ii) of the Framework.

The modest social and economic benefits of housing delivery were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the adverse impacts of locating residential development in a poorly-served rural location with high car dependency, assessed against Framework policies as a whole

Framework references: 11, 105

Plan policies cited: CS1, CS2, LP H7

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.