Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed30 March 20223286827

Land adjacent to 29 Ashcroft Lane, Shenstone, Staffordshire, WS14 0EF

outline application for the erection of a single dwelling including details of means of access

Authority
Lichfield District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Castle S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether or not the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and development plan policy
  • The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt and the purposes of including land within it
  • Whether or not the location of the proposal would be consistent with the spatial strategy of the development plan
  • If the proposal would be inappropriate development, would the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, be clearly outweighed by other considerations, and if so, would this amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt with no very special circumstances to justify it, as the identified harms to openness and the spatial strategy are not clearly outweighed by the limited benefits of a single dwelling.

Framework references: 11, 60, 105, 137, 147, 149

Plan policies cited: Policy CP1, Policy CP3, Policy CP6, Policy R1, Policy NR2, Policy H2, Policy GB1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.