Planning appeal decision
Forge Barn Mill Road, Wyverstone, Stowmarket, IP14 4SE
Planning appeal 3287050 at Forge Barn Mill Road, Wyverstone, Stowmarket, IP14 4SE (Mid Suffolk District Council) was dismissed on 15 September 2022 by Inspector Hickey A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the site would be a suitable location for the proposed development with particular regard to its accessibility to services and facilities.
outline planning application for the erection of a one and a half storey detached dwelling and garage (following demolition of existing nissen hut) together with new vehicular access from Mill Road
- Authority
- Mid Suffolk District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Hickey A
- Postcode
- IP14 4SE
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the site would be a suitable location for the proposed development with particular regard to its accessibility to services and facilities
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- The effect of the proposed development on the setting of nearby Grade II listed buildings, namely Sudbourne Farmhouse, Barn about 40 metres south east of Sudbourne Farmhouse (Shepherds Barn) and The Plough
What decided it
The less than substantial harm to the setting and significance of three Grade II listed buildings, when weighed against the modest public benefits of the proposal, provided a clear reason for refusal under Framework paragraph 11d)(i).
The modest public benefits of housing delivery and temporary construction employment (afforded moderate weight) were outweighed by the less than substantial harm to heritage assets (afforded great weight) and the unsustainable location with reliance on private motor vehicles, resulting in dismissal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- CS 2008 Policy CS1CS 2008 Policy CS2CS 2008 Policy CS05MSFR 2012 Policy FC1MSFR 2012 Policy FC1.1MSFR 2012 Policy CL02MSLP 1998 Policy H7
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 8Paragraph 11Paragraph 110Paragraph 112Paragraph 130Paragraph 199Paragraph 202
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Mid Suffolk District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed15 October 20266012038The Stables, Bobby Hill, Wattisfield, IP22 1NL
- Dismissed14 September 202660102811 Nursery Cottages, Barham, Ipswich, IP6 0PR
- Dismissed8 September 20266010228Land East of 52 Exeter Road, Claydon, Ipswich, IP6 0BP
- Dismissed2 September 20263359620Keytons Pit Newton Road, Sudbury, CO10 0PY
- Quashed On Legal Grounds1 September 20263344278Walnut Meadown, Back Lane, Baylham, Ipswich, IP6 8LE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®