Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed4 July 20233287373

Land East of Assington Barns, The Street, Assington, Sudbury, CO10 5LW

Planning appeal 3287373 at Land East of Assington Barns, The Street, Assington, Sudbury, CO10 5LW (Babergh District Council) was dismissed on 4 July 2023 by Inspector Thompson P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Appeal A: whether the proposal would provide a suitable site for housing, having regard to the Council's Spatial Strategy, the local need for homes, the provision of affordable housing, and any effects on the character and appearance of the site and its surroundings, including to the Special Landscape Area.

Outline planning application with all matters reserved except access for the construction of 18 dwellings comprising 10 x three bed bungalows, 1 x four bed bungalows and 7 x one bed almshouse type units for older persons’. Appeal B: APP/D3505/W/21/3287380 Land to the east of The Barn, Assington Barns, The Street, Assington CO10 5LW

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Thompson P
Postcode
CO10 5LW

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Appeal A: whether the proposal would provide a suitable site for housing, having regard to the Council's Spatial Strategy, the local need for homes, the provision of affordable housing, and any effects on the character and appearance of the site and its surroundings, including to the Special Landscape Area
  • Appeal B: whether suitable living conditions would be provided for future occupiers of the proposed dwellings, with regard to external space and outlook; the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the site and its surroundings; whether the proposal would be at risk from surface water flooding or its development would increase such risks elsewhere; and whether the proposal would affect the provision of community facilities

What decided it

The proposals would not accord with the development plan when considered as a whole, with the adverse impacts of harm to character and appearance, failure to demonstrate proven local need for the housing mix, and (for Appeal B) poor living conditions and unresolved flood risk outweighing the benefits of housing delivery.

The considerable and moderate benefits associated with housing delivery and economic benefits in Appeal A, and moderate and limited benefits in Appeal B, were outweighed by the considerable weight of adverse impacts from non-compliance with the development plan regarding spatial strategy, housing need, character and appearance harm, living conditions, and flood risk, such that the proposals did not amount to sustainable development.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
CSP Policy CS1CSP Policy CS2CSP Policy CS11CSP Policy CS15CSP Policy CS18CSP Policy CS19LP Policy HS34LP Policy CR04ANP Policy ASSN1ANP Policy ASSN2ANP Policy ASSN5ANP Policy ASSN6ANP Policy ASSN14ANP Policy ASSN17JLP Policy SP03
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 8Paragraph 14Paragraph 78Paragraph 167Paragraph 174

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

9 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Babergh District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed14 July 20266006306
    Land At Sheepwash, Cat House Lane, Woolverstone, IP9 1DQ
  2. Allowed5 May 20266003640
    Former Ambulance Station, Duckamere, Bramford, Suffolk, IP8 4AJ
  3. Dismissed18 March 20266002577
    The Threshing Floor, Great Green, Cockfield, Suffolk, IP30 0HQ
  4. Dismissed9 May 20253340859
    High Bank Cottage , Melford Road, Sudbury, CO10 1XU
  5. Dismissed13 March 20253352604
    Land South of High Road, Leavenheath , Colchester, CO6 4NZ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.