Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed4 August 20223288089

107 King's Cross Road, London, WC1X 9LR

Planning appeal 3288089 at 107 King's Cross Road, London, WC1X 9LR (London Borough of Camden) was dismissed on 4 August 2022 by Inspector Simpson L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development on the provision of employment premises within the Borough.

Erection of railings to the front elevation, front stairs to the basement, opening of lightwell to the front and inclusion glass glazing to the basement. Change of Use of Office Storage (Class E) to residential basement flat (C3) (Retrospective)

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Simpson L
Postcode
WC1X 9LR

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the provision of employment premises within the Borough.
  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of Bloomsbury Conservation Area.
  • Whether the development provides an adequate standard of living accommodation for occupiers.
  • The effect of the development on highway safety and the use of sustainable modes of transport, with particular regard to whether provision has been made for car-free development.

What decided it

The development causes less than substantial harm to the conservation area's character and appearance, and lacks a legally binding mechanism to secure car-free development, and these harms are not outweighed by the modest public benefits of the proposal.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy E2Policy D2Policy D1Policy T2Policy T1Policy A1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 130Paragraph 199Paragraph 202

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 774 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Camden

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed29 September 20266008940
    Basement Flat, 226 Finchley Road, London, NW3 6DH
  2. Dismissed8 September 20266009503
    Leapman House, 59 Primrose Gardens, London, NW3 4UL
  3. Allowed15 July 20266005997
    12 Sarre Road, London, NW2 3SL
  4. Notice upheld22 June 20263370592
    Third Floor Flat, 18 Stukeley Street, London, London, WC2B 5LR
  5. Notice upheld22 June 20263370591
    Land at: Fourth-Fifth Floor Duplexes, 18 Stukeley Street, London, WC2B 5LR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.