Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed22 August 20223288261

36 Tile Kiln Hill, Blean, CANTERBURY, CT2 9EE

‘3 No. 4 Bedroom detached dwellings to the rear of 36 Tile Kiln Hill, Blean, Kent CT2 9EE.’

Authority
Canterbury City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Glassar S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the wider area, with particular regard to the effect on the setting of a designated heritage asset
  • nutrient neutrality with particular regard to the Stodmarsh Nature Reserve Special Area of Conservation (SAC) and Ramsar site

What decided it

The harm to the setting of the Blean Conservation Area, characterised as less-than-substantial but nonetheless requiring great weight in the planning balance, was not outweighed by the limited public benefits of three additional dwellings.

the limited public benefits of housing delivery and windfall site provision did not outweigh the less-than-substantial harm to the setting of the designated heritage asset, which the Framework identifies as an irreplaceable resource deserving great weight in its conservation

Framework references: 11, 130, 199, 200, 202

Plan policies cited: Policy SP1, Policy SP4, Policy DBE3, Policy HE1, Policy HE6, Policy HE8

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.