Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed31 March 20223288567

2 Pembroke Villas, London, W8 6PG

Planning appeal 3288567 at 2 Pembroke Villas, London, W8 6PG (Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea) was dismissed on 31 March 2022 by Inspector Ellis G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the property and area, including the conservation area.

Excavation of basement beneath footprint of property and 50% of garden; construction of side extension across lower ground, ground and first floor involving demolition of garage; two storey rear extension involving demolition of existing rear extension; single storey rear infill extension; roof alterations including replacement of slate tiles and enlargement of rear dormer; addition of bike and bin store to front of property

Authority
Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Ellis G
Postcode
W8 6PG

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the property and area, including the conservation area

What decided it

The increased height of the proposed side extension compared to the extant consent would adversely affect the legibility, proportions and relationship of the extension with the host property and harm the character and appearance of the conservation area, contrary to statutory duties and local plan policies.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
CL1CL2CL3CL9CL11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 821 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Planning permission granted23 July 20263328929
    Flat 5, 69 Oxford Gardens, London, W10 5UJ
  2. Allowed23 June 20263362698
    Flat 1 at 28 Brunswick Gardens and Flat 2 at 30 Brunswick Gardens, London, W8 4AL
  3. Dismissed15 June 20266001948
    Land to End of Ledbury Mews West, London, W11 2QZ
  4. Dismissed2 June 20263376699
    Kings Road, Outside No. 395, London, SW10 0LR
  5. Dismissed19 May 20266003102
    Kensington High Street, Outside No. 254, London, W8 6ND

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.