Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed17 February 20223288727

St Annes Road, Headingley, LEEDS, LS6 2AL

15.0m Phase 8 Monopole C/W wrapround Cabinet at base and associated ancillary works

Authority
Leeds City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector
Caines A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the character and appearance of the area, having regard to the setting of the Headingley and Far Headingley Conservation Areas
  • the effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on highway and pedestrian safety
  • if any harm would occur, whether this is outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed taking into account any suitable alternatives

What decided it

The unacceptable impact on highway safety arising from interference with visibility splays at the car park exit, combined with the failure to demonstrate that no suitable alternative sites exist, outweighed any justification for the proposed siting.

Plan policies cited: Policy P10 of the Leeds City Council Core Strategy (as amended 2019), Policy GP5 of the Leeds City Council Unitary Development Plan (Review 2006), Policy T2 of the Leeds City Council Core Strategy

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.