Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed28 February 20223288868

29 Lucy Hall Drive, Baildon, BD17 5BH

Planning appeal 3288868 at 29 Lucy Hall Drive, Baildon, BD17 5BH (City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council) was dismissed on 28 February 2022 by Inspector Burnham T, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.

outline application (including details of scale only) for the erection of 1 dwelling

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Burnham T
Postcode
BD17 5BH

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of nearby residential occupiers
  • Whether the access would be convenient and easy for people to move around on

What decided it

The significant harm to character and appearance combined with harm to living conditions of neighbours, when weighed against the modest contribution of a single dwelling to housing supply, significantly and demonstrably outweighs the benefits when assessed against the Framework as a whole.

The adverse impacts (harm to character and appearance, harm to living conditions of neighbours) were afforded significant weight and were found to significantly and demonstrably outweigh the economic and social benefits of a single dwelling, notwithstanding the local planning authority's inability to demonstrate a five-year housing land supply.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
DS1DS3DS4:DDS4:BDS5
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 130

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

70 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed15 September 20266010672
    25-27 Kensington Street, Bradford, BD8 9LZ
  2. Dismissed11 August 20266004749
    1 Corn Mill Fold, Bradford, BD6 2HQ
  3. Dismissed21 July 20266008478
    95 Lilycroft Road, Bradford, BD9 5AH
  4. Dismissed27 May 20266002874
    1, Chapel Street, Bradford, BD5 0LF
  5. Dismissed7 April 20266004938
    96 Avondale Road, Shipley, West Yorkshire, BD18 4QY

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.