Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed24 January 20233288976

Warehams Grange Sutton Green Road, Sutton Green, Guildford, GU4 7QH

Planning appeal 3288976 at Warehams Grange Sutton Green Road, Sutton Green, Guildford, GU4 7QH (Woking Borough Council) was allowed on 24 January 2023 by Inspector Boffin D, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the alleged breach of planning control/the development constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the development plan and the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework).

Erection of extension to dwelling, consisting of pool house, plant room, loggia and garage/car port (Part Retrospective application); enforcement notice alleging construction of a detached single storey structure comprising a triple bay garage and guest cottage

Authority
Woking Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Boffin D
Postcode
GU4 7QH

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the alleged breach of planning control/the development constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the development plan and the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework)
  • If the alleged breach of planning control/development constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt its effect on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
  • Whether the development would constitute ancillary accommodation with regard to the development plan
  • Whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations. If so, whether this amounts to the very special circumstances required to justify the alleged breach of planning control/development

What decided it

The considerable weight given to the Unilateral Undertaking securing demolition of the existing stables and non-implementation of the 2008 stables permission, which clearly outweighed the substantial Green Belt harm and amounted to very special circumstances.

The considerable weight attached to the UU obligations (demolition of the stables and abandonment of the 2008 permission) clearly outweighed the substantial weight given to the harm to the Green Belt from inappropriateness and loss of openness, amounting to very special circumstances justifying the development.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CS6DMP Policy DM13DMP Policy DM9
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 149Paragraph 147Paragraph 148Paragraph 57
Judgments
Dunnett Investments Ltd v SSCLG & East Dorset DC [2017] EWCA Civ 192; Trump International Golf Club Scotland Limited v Scottish Ministers [2015] UKSC 74; [2016] 1 WLR 85; RSBS Developments Ltd v SSHCLG & Brent LBC [2020] EWHC 3077 (Admin); Warwick DC v SSLUHC, Mr J Storer & Mrs A Lowe [2022] EWHC 2145 (Admin)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

51 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Woking Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed19 October 20266006780
    East House, Chobham Road, Woking, GU21 2TU
  2. Dismissed17 April 20266005476
    2 Carters Lane Cottages, Carters Lane, Old Woking, Surrey, GU22 8JQ
  3. Dismissed30 January 20263373785
    Land at Manor Cottages, Carthouse Lane, Woking, Surrey
  4. Notice upheld23 January 20263373472
    Unit 5 Abbot Close , West Byfleet, Surrey, KT14 7JN
  5. Dismissed7 October 20253363996
    Runtley Wood Farm Runtley Wood Lane, Sutton Green, Guildford, GU4 7QQ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.