Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed30 January 20263373785

Land at Manor Cottages, Carthouse Lane, Woking, Surrey

the demolition of 3 existing barns and the erection of 4 dwellings. Alongside this, a conversion of 1 existing barn to create a further dwelling (total of 5 dwellings)

Authority
Woking Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Gardner L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the appeal site is grey belt land and whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies, including the effect upon the openness of the Green Belt
  • whether the site is suitable for the proposed development, having regard to relevant policies for the location of housing and the proximity to services and facilities
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether the proposal would have an acceptable effect on the living conditions of the occupiers of 5 Manor Cottages, with particular regard to outlook
  • the effect of the development on protected species, in particular bats
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development

What decided it

The substantial weight given to Green Belt harm by reason of inappropriateness, together with significant weight given to harm to character and appearance, neighbouring living conditions, and uncertainty regarding protected species impacts, were not clearly outweighed by the moderate weight of other considerations including housing delivery and economic benefits.

The substantial weight to be given to Green Belt harm by reason of inappropriateness, together with the significant weight given to other harms identified (unsuitable location, harm to character and appearance, harm to neighbouring outlook, and uncertainty regarding protected species), were not clearly outweighed by other considerations which carried moderate weight, therefore very special circumstances did not exist.

Framework references: 11, 143, 153, 154, 155

Plan policies cited: Policy CS6, Policy CS1, Policy CS18, Policy CS21, Policy CS24, Policy CS7, Policy DM13

Judgments cited: Lee Valley Regional Park Authority, R (on the application of) v Epping Forest District Council & Anor (Rev 1) [2016] EWCA Civ 404; R (on the application of Samuel Smith Old Brewery (Tadcaster) and others) (Respondents) v North Yorkshire County Council (Appellant) [2020] UKSC 3; Mansell v Tonbridge and Malling BC & others [2017] EWCA Civ 1314; Gambone v SSCLG [2014] EWHC 952 (Admin)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.