Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed2 September 20223289034

Land at Sandown Park, Royal Tunbridge Wells, TN2 4RT

Planning appeal 3289034 at Land at Sandown Park, Royal Tunbridge Wells, TN2 4RT (Tunbridge Wells Borough Council) was dismissed on 2 September 2022 by Inspector Worden M, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The extent to which the proposal is consistent with the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies relating to the Green Belt.

outline application (Access not reserved) - Development of a care community within Use Class C2 of up to 108 units of accommodation for older persons in need of personal and nursing care; associated communal facilities and services to meet residents' day to day needs and associated facilities for staff; car parking for residents, visitors and staff of the community; associated landscaping and outdoor amenity areas; and associated infrastructure

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Major retail and services
Inspector
Worden M
Postcode
TN2 4RT

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The extent to which the proposal is consistent with the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies relating to the Green Belt.
  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area with particular regard to the setting of the High Weald Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty
  • The effect of the proposed development on the special interest of nearby heritage assets with particular regard to the Royal Tunbridge Wells Conservation Area and the setting of Pembury Grange
  • The effect of the proposed development on existing trees and the adjacent Ancient Woodland
  • Other considerations to be weighed in the planning balance including the housing land supply position and the need for specialist residential accommodation
  • Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm including effect on the openness of the Green Belt and the purposes of including land within it, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the proposal.

What decided it

The substantial weight required to be given to Green Belt harm, combined with other identified harms, was not clearly outweighed by the benefits, so the very special circumstances necessary to justify inappropriate development did not exist.

Significant Green Belt harm (substantial weight), significant harm to character and appearance, moderate harm to the AONB setting, and less than substantial (higher end) heritage harm to Pembury Grange were weighed against benefits including the housing land supply shortfall, need for older persons' accommodation, wellbeing, economic and biodiversity benefits; the harms were not clearly outweighed, so very special circumstances were not established and the appeal was dismissed.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Core Policy 2Core Policy 4Core Policy 9Core Policy 14Policy MGB1Policy EN25Policy EN1Policy EN13Policy ENV23Policy H6
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 61Paragraph 111Paragraph 137Paragraph 138Paragraph 147Paragraph 148Paragraph 176Paragraph 199Paragraph 202

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

24 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Tunbridge Wells

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed10 July 20266007577
    The Mill House, Powder Mill Lane, Tunbridge Wells, TN4 9EG
  2. Dismissed30 July 20253363702
    6 Woodside Close, Pembury, Tunbridge Wells, TN2 4BQ
  3. Dismissed15 July 20253352738
    Beacon Hotel, Tea Garden Lane, Royal Tunbridge Wells, Kent, TN3 9JH
  4. Dismissed2 July 20253361716
    The Meadows, Pastheap Farm Hastings Road, Pembury, Tunbridge Wells, TN2 4BL
  5. Dismissed2 June 20253347954
    Milford House Penshurst Road, Speldhurst, Tunbridge Wells, TN3 0PH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.