Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 June 20223289259

Craven Heifer, Main Street, Addingham, ILKLEY, LS29 0PL

construction of two houses

Authority
City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Cross D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would make suitable provision for the parking of vehicles, with due regard to highway safety and the living conditions of nearby residents in respect of access to vehicle parking

What decided it

The inadequate provision of car parking for the Craven Heifer business would result in significant overspill parking in nearby residential areas and unacceptable harm to highway safety, which could not be outweighed by the limited housing and design benefits of the proposal.

The benefits of housing supply and improved character and appearance were outweighed by the significant harm arising from inadequate car parking provision and highway safety impacts; the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed the identified benefits when assessed against the Framework taken as a whole

Framework references: 11

Plan policies cited: Policy DS4, Policy DS5, Policy TR2

Judgments cited: Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE (1982)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.