Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 June 20223289259

Craven Heifer, Main Street, Addingham, Ilkley, LS29 0PL

Planning appeal 3289259 at Craven Heifer, Main Street, Addingham, Ilkley, LS29 0PL (City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council) was dismissed on 10 June 2022 by Inspector Cross D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would make suitable provision for the parking of vehicles, with due regard to highway safety and the living conditions of nearby residents in respect of access to vehicle parking.

construction of two houses

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Cross D
Postcode
LS29 0PL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would make suitable provision for the parking of vehicles, with due regard to highway safety and the living conditions of nearby residents in respect of access to vehicle parking

What decided it

The inadequate provision of car parking for the Craven Heifer business would result in significant overspill parking in nearby residential areas and unacceptable harm to highway safety, which could not be outweighed by the limited housing and design benefits of the proposal.

The benefits of housing supply and improved character and appearance were outweighed by the significant harm arising from inadequate car parking provision and highway safety impacts; the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed the identified benefits when assessed against the Framework taken as a whole

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DS4Policy DS5Policy TR2
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11
Judgments
Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE (1982)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

21 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed15 September 20266010672
    25-27 Kensington Street, Bradford, BD8 9LZ
  2. Dismissed11 August 20266004749
    1 Corn Mill Fold, Bradford, BD6 2HQ
  3. Dismissed21 July 20266008478
    95 Lilycroft Road, Bradford, BD9 5AH
  4. Dismissed27 May 20266002874
    1, Chapel Street, Bradford, BD5 0LF
  5. Dismissed7 April 20266004938
    96 Avondale Road, Shipley, West Yorkshire, BD18 4QY

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.